Two cities – one in Iran and another in Nigeria – can claim title because WHO measures pollution in two different ways.
The
new WHO database of worldwide air pollution measures it in two
different ways, and as a result two cities – one in Iran and another in
Nigeria – can lay claim to the unenviable title of world’s most polluted
city.
It all comes down to which minute particles, or
particulate matter (PM), in the air are being measured. These particles
are between 2.5 and 10 microns in diameter, roughly 30 times smaller
than the width of a human hair.
The coarser PM10s include dust
stirred up by cars on roads and the wind, soot from open fires and
partially burned carbon from the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil
and wood. The particles are small enough to be inhaled deep into the
lungs.
But the ultra-fine particles known as PM2.5s can only
be seen with microscopes and are produced from all kinds of combustion.
These are small enough to get from the lungs into the blood supply and
are possibly more deadly because they affect the cardiovascular system.
Many
cities in developing countries traditionally monitor only PM10s. But
increasingly PM2.5 pollution is seen as the best measure of how bad air
pollution is for health. Richer countries usually have higher levels of
PM 2.5s, while low income countries have higher levels of PM10s. Both,
says the WHO, are deadly.
Onitsha: highest for PM10s
In
2013, two people died of heat exhaustion after a six-hour gridlock on
the city’s bridge over the river Niger. Cars and trucks on the main road
to Lagos belch fumes from burning low-quality diesel, and the air often
stinks of burning waste from rubbish dumps, the smoke from old ships on
the river and discharges from the metal workshops.
But
people did not expect Onitsha in Anambra state on the eastern bank of
the mile-wide river Niger, to be named the most polluted in the world.
According
to the WHO, an air quality monitor there registered 594 micrograms per
cubic metre of microscopic PM10 particles, and 66 of the more deadly
PM2.5s. Onitsha’s figures are nearly twice as bad as notoriously
polluted cities such as Kabul, Beijing and Tehran and 30 times worse
than London.
“We know pollution is very bad here. But this city
must be much better than Lagos,” said Solomon Okechukwa, a sceptical
Anambra state official, on Wednesday.
But Onitsha, say
academics, is a textbook example of the perils of rapid urbanisation
without planning or public services creating a sustained pollution
assault on its water and air.
As a tropical port city which has
doubled in size to over 1 million people in just a few years, it is
frequently shrouded in plumes of black diesel smoke from old ships; it
has no proper waste incineration plants; its construction sites and
workshops emit clouds of dust and its heavy traffic is some of the worst
in Nigeria.
A recent study of Onitsha’s water pollution found
more than 100 petrol stations in the city, often selling low-quality
fuel, dozens of unregulated rubbish dumps, major fuel spills and high
levels of arsenic, mercury, lead, copper and iron in its water. The
city’s many metal industries, private hospitals and workshops were all
said to be heavy polluters emitting chemical, hospital and household
waste and sewage.
“The level of pollution in Onitsha is getting increasingly serious,” said the authors.
However,
the WHO also said on Wednesday that the pollution data from Onitsha was
not necessarily reliable because it came from a single monitoring
station.
“It is difficult to get accurate measurements in Africa.
You can get super-high readings, but ideally the measurements should be
done over a year to include different seasons and times of day. The
reading in Onitsha may be representative but not altogether reliable,”
said a WHO spokeswoman.
Zabol: highest for PM2.5s
Zabol,
an eastern Iranian city on the border with Afghanistan, was once at the
heart of a bustling ancient civilisation, close to where the very first
piece of animation came from in the form of an intricate pottery bowl
dating back 5,000 years that displays a goat in motion.
But the city is now a largely neglected area plagued by poverty - and pollution.
Every
summer, as temperatures rise to staggering levels of 40C or even
higher, Zabol is struck by what is locally known as “120 days of wind”,
relentless dust storms from north to south.
But the
disappearance in the early 2000s of a nearby wetland, Hamoun, has
exacerbated the situation to an unprecedented extent. Over many
centuries, the wetland was crucial to the development of the area,
serving as its natural cooler. Now it has dried up and become a major
source of dust in the air.
Zabol is only 45 minute’s drive away
from Shahr-i Sokhta (Burnt City), a Unesco-designated world heritage
site, home to the remains of a mudbrick city belonging to the bronze
age.
In recent years, suffocating dust storms sweeping across
Zabol have repeatedly disrupted life, closing down schools and
government offices. Last year officials were forced to distribute free
masks and national headlines such as “Zabol’s pollution reaching 40
times more than normal” have become part of daily life. Similar storms
have also ravaged west of the country.
Mohsen Soleymani, the
national project manager for preservation of Iranian wetlands, said
pollution in Zabol was different from that in Tehran or Beijing, where
it is linked to industry. “We are facing a critical situation in Zabol
and the 120 days of wind period worsens the dust storms every year,” he
told the Guardian.
“The drying up of Hamoun is the main reason
behind this level of pollution but other factions have contributed to
the situation such as bad management of our water resources in the
past.”
According to Soleymani more than 700,000 job opportunities
have disappeared because of the wetland’s situation. According to a
report published by Iran’s Shargh daily, more than 500 people are
diagnosed with tuberculosis in Zabol every year due to dust pollution,
an unusual rate in the country. Hamoun’s crisis has forced people out of
nearly 300 villages in the province, the Iranian daily reported.
Kaveh
Madani, a senior lecturer in environmental management from Imperial
College London, said: “The thirst for development in Iran increased as a
result of the 1979 revolution, Iraq-Iran war and the international
sanctions..
“Iranians continued developing infrastructure without
a real concern about the long-term environmental consequences of their
development plans, which normally lacked strong environmental impact
assessments.”
Air pollution, dust storms, drying lakes and
rivers, declining groundwater levels, land subsidence, deforestation,
and desertification are on the menu of environmental products caused by
unsustainable development, he said.
“Some of the problems,
however, are not domestic products. Transboundary conflicts over Helmand
(Hirmand) river with Afghanistan, resulting in water shortage and
intensified dust storms have heavily impacted the lives of those living
around the Hamouns wetlands,” he said.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment